North Charleston

What North Charleston’s boards have decided, read from the record.

Zoning appeals and planning commission action, read the same way and held to the same standard as every other place we cover, and tied to the parcel each one was about.

How we read the record Talk to us

99.51%Weighted · audited 2026‑07‑30

Of case records audited against their source documents, weighted to the corpus’s real composition, 99.51% agreed with the source — measured on the Charleston Board of Zoning Appeals corpus.

What that number measures, what it doesn’t, and why we won’t publish 100% →

Coverage

What we hold for North Charleston, and whether it can carry a rate.

Sources held and classified for this city

Can carry a published approval rate

Cannot — each row says why

Generated from the store, observed 2026-08-01. The same registry the full coverage page reads from, filtered to this city. Counts are floors — they describe what we have classified, not everything that exists. **Readable text** is the share of the documents that produce a board's cases which carry an extractable text layer, measured by fetching every catalogued document.
Jurisdiction	Body	Record kind	Readable text	Rate?	Why
North Charleston	City Council	approved_only	not a document corpus	No	The source lists what was adopted. A refusal cannot appear in it, so a rate computed from it would be 100% by construction.
North Charleston	Planning Commission	recommendation	96.5%	No	The body recommends; another body decides. A recommendation is advice, not a result.
North Charleston	Board of Zoning Appeals	full_disposition	98.7%	Yes	The source records every outcome, including refusals.

Elsewhere in the county

North Charleston is one of three places we hold so far.

↑ All of Charleston County City of Charleston → Mount Pleasant →

Have a North Charleston parcel already in mind?

Tell us the address or the TMS and we’ll tell you plainly whether the record covers it — including when it doesn’t.

grier@upyourbids.com